Maryland’s Chief Judge Robert Bell’s inspiring keynote reminded participants to keep those families who are less fortunate in mind while developing a roadmap for the future, and Georgia’s retired Chief Justice Leah Ward Sears, in her heartfelt concluding address, urged us to focus on the preservation of stable families when possible, even while considering the divorce process.
A small group led by CFCC Senior Fellow Gloria Danziger discusses the availability and use of services for family court litigants. (Photo by Chris Hart) |
At the end of the two days, not only did we have a rich, multidisciplinary understanding of the effects of the current system on children and families, but we also had practical action plans covering the gamut of relevant issues, from family resources to an overtaxed judicial system and many more.
We at CFCC look forward to working with the ABA, all of the symposium’s sponsors and participants, and the wider community to implement these action plans. The symposium has set in motion a movement toward real change, based on a holistic and therapeutic approach to family law. Although the Families Matter Symposium accomplished so much in such a short period of time, the real work lies ahead of us. The Families Matter initiative – a multiyear project – is just beginning. I encourage you to become involved as we move forward. Check back often and please check the links on CFCC’s website for recordings of both keynotes and pictures from the event. CFCC and the ABA Section of Family Law hope to publish the proceedings shortly. We also encourage you to join in this critical discussion on this blog and in your communities.
Very well done. Funny, I blogged about it too (http://www.kssfamilylaw.com/blog/?p=79). Here's some of what I said:
ReplyDeleteWhile the program was a great start, it was only that, a start. There were great ideas that will take a lot of effort and time to implement. There was a consensus that it is impossible to create a flow chart for a family law case that would work perfectly. Every case is different. But there was agreement on many needed changes to the family law system. The concept of “triage”, immediately figuring out what a case needs and prioritizing situations based on different priorities (violence, kids needs, foreclosure?) was considered. ”Early case intervention” was another popular (and similar) thought. Another discussion focused on law school preparation (and encouragement) of students to practice in this area.
So what are the next steps? One step is a comprehensive CLE Program which will be worked into the ABA Family Law Section‘s next Spring CLE seminar. Beyond that we must figure out how to assimilate these and other great ideas into the general practice of family law. Judge and lawyer training and specialization? More frank discussions between the bench and bar (and mental health experts)? Family law is becoming more, not less complex. Relocation issues, gay marriage issues, international custody issues are all on the rise. Without consistently taking the time to study and try to improve our family law system, we do a disservice to our community.
Kudos to all those (and there are so, so many) that take the time and effort to work to better our system. Our superior court judges and their staffs, the many governmental agencies that are overburdened, and the legal and mental health practitioners who see the problems daily are all doing their part. The question is what else can we do. Certainly we all agree more needs to be done. So let’s keep exploring what can be done, and of course, lets do as much as we all can.
Thanks for your comment, Randy. Your question about how we can each make a difference is an important one. Too often, people talk about reform but don't actually implement their good ideas. At the Symposium, we really had a collection of individuals who were all ready and willing to not only discuss but to actually do something - and it is important for all of us to keep that mindset going forward.
ReplyDeleteOne of the advantages of this initiative is that, because it has in some ways just begun (even though there was a lot of work put into getting to where we are), all of the participants and other professionals who are passionate for reform can really help to map where it goes and determine their own level of involvement.